Post by Del Snavely on Dec 15, 2009 23:47:40 GMT -6
Positions of Religious Groups that Support Medical Marijuana
Several major denominations and other religious groups have official positions supporting medical marijuana.
These positions are detailed below. We encourage anyone working on this issue to utilize this support. Please
contact us to find out how to put this information to good use.
United Methodist Church
The United Methodist Church adopted the following position at their General Conference in 2004 by a vote of
877-19:
“Some countries permit the use of marijuana in medicines. Recently, some states in the United States have
passed legislation permitting the medical use of marijuana. The medical use of any drug should not be seen as
encouraging recreational use of the drug. We urge all persons to abstain from all use of marijuana, unless it has
been legally prescribed in a form appropriate for treating a particular medical condition.”
Subsequently, the United Methodist General Board of Church and Society signed on to the following statement:
“Licensed medical doctors should not be punished for recommending the medical use of marijuana to seriously
ill people, and seriously ill people should not be subject to criminal sanctions for using marijuana if the
patient’s physician has told the patient that such use is likely to be beneficial.”
Presbyterian Church (USA)
On June 21, 2006, the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church (USA) became the latest religious body to
endorse legal access to medical marijuana for seriously ill patients. By consensus, the denomination passed a
resolution “urging Federal legislation that allows for its use and that provides for the production and distribution
of the plant for those purposes.”
Item: 09-03
Title: On Medical Use of Marijuana
Item URL: les-pcusa.org/Item.aspx?IID=134&
Assembly Action
The Assembly adopted the Committee’s recommendation to approve
On this Item, the Assembly acted by consensus
Committee Recommendation
On Item 09-03, the Social Justice Issues Committee voted as follows:
Motion was carried by a Counted vote.
- Affirmative:44
- Negative:16
- Abstention:1
The committee hereby recommends approval...
RESOLUTION
The Presbytery of Homestead overtures the 217th General Assembly (2006) to do the following:
1. Reaffirm the PCUS statement of the 111th General Assembly (1971) that “marijuana is not properly
classified” (Minutes, PCUS, 1971, Part I, p. 147).
2. Affirm the use of cannabis sativa or marijuana for legitimate medical purposes as recommended by a
physician.
3. Instruct the Stated Clerk of the General Assembly to inform the office of the president of United
States, urging Federal legislation that allows for its use and that provides for the production and
distribution of the plant for those purposes.
4. Seek Federal protection for patients, caregivers, and their physicians from prosecution by local and
state authorities, and physicians from negative repercussions by their licensing bodies.
United Church of Christ
The United Church of Christ’s Ministry for Criminal Justice & Human Rights signed a Coalition for
Compassionate Access statement in 2002, proclaiming, “We believe that seriously ill people should not be
subject to arrest and imprisonment for using medical marijuana with their doctors’ approval.”
Progressive National Baptist Convention
In 2004, the Progressive National Baptist Convention signed onto the following statement: “Licensed medical
doctors should not be punished for recommending the medical use of marijuana to seriously ill people, and
seriously ill people should not be subject to criminal sanctions for using marijuana if the patient’s physician has
told the patient that such use is likely to be beneficial.”
Episcopal Church
In 1982, the Episcopal Church passed a resolution in support of prescriptive access. [67th Convention of the
Episcopal Church (B-004)a] The statement says that, “the Episcopal Church urges the adoption by Congress
and all states of statutes providing that the use of marijuana be permitted when deemed medically appropriate
by duly licensed medical practitioners.”
Billy Graham Ministries
In a 1998 letter to the husband of the late medical marijuana patient Cheryl Miller who was suffering from
multiple sclerosis, Alison Barker of the Christian Guidance Department of the Billy Graham Evangelistic
Association wrote, “This should not have a negative reflection on one’s Christian testimony….Since we are
talking specifically about marijuana as a medicine, we would hope for a way to find a special exception in
Cheryl’s case, since it has been proven to be of great help to her.”
Unitarian Universalist Association
In 2002, the Unitarian Universalist Association passed a comprehensive Statement of Conscience on drug
policy after two years of nationwide study. It says, in part, “Make all drugs legally available with a prescription
by a licensed physician, subject to professional oversight. End the practice of punishing an individual for
obtaining, possessing, or using an otherwise illegal substance to treat a medical condition.”
In 2004, the Unitarian Universalist Association signed onto the following statement: “Licensed medical doctors
should not be punished for recommending the medical use of marijuana to seriously ill people, and seriously ill
people should not be subject to criminal sanctions for using marijuana if the patient’s physician has told the
patient that such use is likely to be beneficial.”
Union for Reform Judaism
In 2003, the 67th General Assembly of the Union for Reform Judaism passed the following resolution in support
of medical marijuana (all of which is quoted verbatim):
BACKGROUND
According to our tradition, a physician is obligated to heal the sick (Maimonides commentary on Mishnah
Nedarim 4:4). The use of marijuana as medicine goes back at least 5,000 years. Under the Controlled
Substances Act of 1970, U.S. law currently defines marijuana as a Schedule I drug-a prohibited substance-
having no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States, a high potential for abuse, and a
lack of evidence of safety for use under medical supervision. In contrast, Schedule II drugs have restricted
access as highly controlled medications that are prescribed in writing in triplicate using the physician's assigned
number. Moreover, Schedule II medications are for use in pain management for a limited period of time in
limited quantity.
Anecdotally based reports on the medical use of marijuana have indicated that it provides relief from
symptoms, conditions and treatment side effects of several serious illnesses. These include glaucoma, the
wasting syndrome associated with HIV/AIDS, nausea associated with cancer chemotherapy, and muscle spasms
that often accompany multiple sclerosis and chronic pain. Thus far, scientific studies regarding the efficacy and
safety of marijuana use for therapeutic purposes have been inconclusive.
In recent years the development and implementation of pain management have changed. In the United States,
more than 30 states have approved legislation in support of the medicinal use of marijuana. U.S. federal law
supersedes state law, however, and prevents the implementation of these states' mandates. Because marijuana is
not legally available in the U.S., except for research purposes pursuant to limited Investigational New Drug
applications approved by the Food and Drug Administration, many patients cannot avail themselves of this
therapy and must resort to the black market to obtain relief and are thus subject to arrest or incarceration. At this
time, Health Canada, the Canadian federal department of health, permits the use of marijuana for medical
purposes. A court case is pending to determine the method by which patients will obtain the marijuana.
In January 1997, the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy asked the Institute of Medicine to
assess the potential health benefits and risks of marijuana and its cannabinoid compounds (the primary
psychoactive ingredients). The Institute of Medicine's report, released in March 1999, recommends continued
research into physiological effects of marijuana's constituent cannabinoids and their potential therapeutic value
for pain relief, including closely monitored clinical trials of smoked marijuana. The Institute of Medicine's
report also recommends short term use (less than 6 months) of marijuana for patients with debilitating
symptoms for whom all approved medications have failed and relief of symptoms could be reasonably
expected, with treatment administered under medical supervision and the guidance of an institutional review
board.
THEREFORE, the Union for Reform Judaism resolves to:
1. Urge elected officials in the United States to support federal legislation and regulation to allow the
medicinal use of marijuana for patients with intractable pain and other conditions, under medical
supervision;
2. Urge the Food and Drug Administration to expand the scope of allowable Investigational New Drug
applications in order to move research forward more quickly toward an approved product;
3. Call for further medical research on marijuana and its constituent compounds with the goal of
developing reliable and safe cannabinoid drugs for management of debilitating conditions; and
4. Call upon congregations to advocate for the necessary changes in local, state and federal law to permit
the medicinal use of marijuana and ensure its accessibility for that purpose.
In 2004, the Union for Reform Judaism signed onto the following statement: “Licensed medical doctors should
not be punished for recommending the medical use of marijuana to seriously ill people, and seriously ill people
should not be subject to criminal sanctions for using marijuana if the patient’s physician has told the patient that
such use is likely to be beneficial.”
Partial support from other religious groups
In 2002, the executive offices of several religious groups endorsed a coalition sign-on statement called “Eight
Steps to Effectively Controlling Drug Abuse & The Drug Market,” which includes the recommendation,
“Respect State's Rights and Allow New Approaches to Be Tried.” The statement elaborates, “The Federal
government should work with states that have voted fourteen times for reform measures over the last three
election cycles. Reforms have included treatment instead of prison, medical use of marijuana, marijuana
decriminalization and stopping abuse of forfeiture laws. The federal government has opposed many of these
reforms and taken steps to block them from being implemented. But, the states are laboratories for new
approaches that should be tried and, if effective, duplicated in other parts of the United States.”
Religious groups that endorsed this statement include: National Council of Churches; Evangelical Lutheran
Church in America; Presbyterian Church (USA); Progressive Jewish Alliance; Rainbow/PUSH
Coalition; and the Religious Society of Friends (Philadelphia Yearly Meeting).
Note that this statement does not specify whether or not the medical use of marijuana should be legally allowed,
but simply that individual states should be allowed to make their own decisions on the matter.
Several major denominations and other religious groups have official positions supporting medical marijuana.
These positions are detailed below. We encourage anyone working on this issue to utilize this support. Please
contact us to find out how to put this information to good use.
United Methodist Church
The United Methodist Church adopted the following position at their General Conference in 2004 by a vote of
877-19:
“Some countries permit the use of marijuana in medicines. Recently, some states in the United States have
passed legislation permitting the medical use of marijuana. The medical use of any drug should not be seen as
encouraging recreational use of the drug. We urge all persons to abstain from all use of marijuana, unless it has
been legally prescribed in a form appropriate for treating a particular medical condition.”
Subsequently, the United Methodist General Board of Church and Society signed on to the following statement:
“Licensed medical doctors should not be punished for recommending the medical use of marijuana to seriously
ill people, and seriously ill people should not be subject to criminal sanctions for using marijuana if the
patient’s physician has told the patient that such use is likely to be beneficial.”
Presbyterian Church (USA)
On June 21, 2006, the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church (USA) became the latest religious body to
endorse legal access to medical marijuana for seriously ill patients. By consensus, the denomination passed a
resolution “urging Federal legislation that allows for its use and that provides for the production and distribution
of the plant for those purposes.”
Item: 09-03
Title: On Medical Use of Marijuana
Item URL: les-pcusa.org/Item.aspx?IID=134&
Assembly Action
The Assembly adopted the Committee’s recommendation to approve
On this Item, the Assembly acted by consensus
Committee Recommendation
On Item 09-03, the Social Justice Issues Committee voted as follows:
Motion was carried by a Counted vote.
- Affirmative:44
- Negative:16
- Abstention:1
The committee hereby recommends approval...
RESOLUTION
The Presbytery of Homestead overtures the 217th General Assembly (2006) to do the following:
1. Reaffirm the PCUS statement of the 111th General Assembly (1971) that “marijuana is not properly
classified” (Minutes, PCUS, 1971, Part I, p. 147).
2. Affirm the use of cannabis sativa or marijuana for legitimate medical purposes as recommended by a
physician.
3. Instruct the Stated Clerk of the General Assembly to inform the office of the president of United
States, urging Federal legislation that allows for its use and that provides for the production and
distribution of the plant for those purposes.
4. Seek Federal protection for patients, caregivers, and their physicians from prosecution by local and
state authorities, and physicians from negative repercussions by their licensing bodies.
United Church of Christ
The United Church of Christ’s Ministry for Criminal Justice & Human Rights signed a Coalition for
Compassionate Access statement in 2002, proclaiming, “We believe that seriously ill people should not be
subject to arrest and imprisonment for using medical marijuana with their doctors’ approval.”
Progressive National Baptist Convention
In 2004, the Progressive National Baptist Convention signed onto the following statement: “Licensed medical
doctors should not be punished for recommending the medical use of marijuana to seriously ill people, and
seriously ill people should not be subject to criminal sanctions for using marijuana if the patient’s physician has
told the patient that such use is likely to be beneficial.”
Episcopal Church
In 1982, the Episcopal Church passed a resolution in support of prescriptive access. [67th Convention of the
Episcopal Church (B-004)a] The statement says that, “the Episcopal Church urges the adoption by Congress
and all states of statutes providing that the use of marijuana be permitted when deemed medically appropriate
by duly licensed medical practitioners.”
Billy Graham Ministries
In a 1998 letter to the husband of the late medical marijuana patient Cheryl Miller who was suffering from
multiple sclerosis, Alison Barker of the Christian Guidance Department of the Billy Graham Evangelistic
Association wrote, “This should not have a negative reflection on one’s Christian testimony….Since we are
talking specifically about marijuana as a medicine, we would hope for a way to find a special exception in
Cheryl’s case, since it has been proven to be of great help to her.”
Unitarian Universalist Association
In 2002, the Unitarian Universalist Association passed a comprehensive Statement of Conscience on drug
policy after two years of nationwide study. It says, in part, “Make all drugs legally available with a prescription
by a licensed physician, subject to professional oversight. End the practice of punishing an individual for
obtaining, possessing, or using an otherwise illegal substance to treat a medical condition.”
In 2004, the Unitarian Universalist Association signed onto the following statement: “Licensed medical doctors
should not be punished for recommending the medical use of marijuana to seriously ill people, and seriously ill
people should not be subject to criminal sanctions for using marijuana if the patient’s physician has told the
patient that such use is likely to be beneficial.”
Union for Reform Judaism
In 2003, the 67th General Assembly of the Union for Reform Judaism passed the following resolution in support
of medical marijuana (all of which is quoted verbatim):
BACKGROUND
According to our tradition, a physician is obligated to heal the sick (Maimonides commentary on Mishnah
Nedarim 4:4). The use of marijuana as medicine goes back at least 5,000 years. Under the Controlled
Substances Act of 1970, U.S. law currently defines marijuana as a Schedule I drug-a prohibited substance-
having no currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States, a high potential for abuse, and a
lack of evidence of safety for use under medical supervision. In contrast, Schedule II drugs have restricted
access as highly controlled medications that are prescribed in writing in triplicate using the physician's assigned
number. Moreover, Schedule II medications are for use in pain management for a limited period of time in
limited quantity.
Anecdotally based reports on the medical use of marijuana have indicated that it provides relief from
symptoms, conditions and treatment side effects of several serious illnesses. These include glaucoma, the
wasting syndrome associated with HIV/AIDS, nausea associated with cancer chemotherapy, and muscle spasms
that often accompany multiple sclerosis and chronic pain. Thus far, scientific studies regarding the efficacy and
safety of marijuana use for therapeutic purposes have been inconclusive.
In recent years the development and implementation of pain management have changed. In the United States,
more than 30 states have approved legislation in support of the medicinal use of marijuana. U.S. federal law
supersedes state law, however, and prevents the implementation of these states' mandates. Because marijuana is
not legally available in the U.S., except for research purposes pursuant to limited Investigational New Drug
applications approved by the Food and Drug Administration, many patients cannot avail themselves of this
therapy and must resort to the black market to obtain relief and are thus subject to arrest or incarceration. At this
time, Health Canada, the Canadian federal department of health, permits the use of marijuana for medical
purposes. A court case is pending to determine the method by which patients will obtain the marijuana.
In January 1997, the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy asked the Institute of Medicine to
assess the potential health benefits and risks of marijuana and its cannabinoid compounds (the primary
psychoactive ingredients). The Institute of Medicine's report, released in March 1999, recommends continued
research into physiological effects of marijuana's constituent cannabinoids and their potential therapeutic value
for pain relief, including closely monitored clinical trials of smoked marijuana. The Institute of Medicine's
report also recommends short term use (less than 6 months) of marijuana for patients with debilitating
symptoms for whom all approved medications have failed and relief of symptoms could be reasonably
expected, with treatment administered under medical supervision and the guidance of an institutional review
board.
THEREFORE, the Union for Reform Judaism resolves to:
1. Urge elected officials in the United States to support federal legislation and regulation to allow the
medicinal use of marijuana for patients with intractable pain and other conditions, under medical
supervision;
2. Urge the Food and Drug Administration to expand the scope of allowable Investigational New Drug
applications in order to move research forward more quickly toward an approved product;
3. Call for further medical research on marijuana and its constituent compounds with the goal of
developing reliable and safe cannabinoid drugs for management of debilitating conditions; and
4. Call upon congregations to advocate for the necessary changes in local, state and federal law to permit
the medicinal use of marijuana and ensure its accessibility for that purpose.
In 2004, the Union for Reform Judaism signed onto the following statement: “Licensed medical doctors should
not be punished for recommending the medical use of marijuana to seriously ill people, and seriously ill people
should not be subject to criminal sanctions for using marijuana if the patient’s physician has told the patient that
such use is likely to be beneficial.”
Partial support from other religious groups
In 2002, the executive offices of several religious groups endorsed a coalition sign-on statement called “Eight
Steps to Effectively Controlling Drug Abuse & The Drug Market,” which includes the recommendation,
“Respect State's Rights and Allow New Approaches to Be Tried.” The statement elaborates, “The Federal
government should work with states that have voted fourteen times for reform measures over the last three
election cycles. Reforms have included treatment instead of prison, medical use of marijuana, marijuana
decriminalization and stopping abuse of forfeiture laws. The federal government has opposed many of these
reforms and taken steps to block them from being implemented. But, the states are laboratories for new
approaches that should be tried and, if effective, duplicated in other parts of the United States.”
Religious groups that endorsed this statement include: National Council of Churches; Evangelical Lutheran
Church in America; Presbyterian Church (USA); Progressive Jewish Alliance; Rainbow/PUSH
Coalition; and the Religious Society of Friends (Philadelphia Yearly Meeting).
Note that this statement does not specify whether or not the medical use of marijuana should be legally allowed,
but simply that individual states should be allowed to make their own decisions on the matter.
